Wednesday, January 13, 2010

#98: Phantom Lady (Robert Siodmak, 1944)

Released: February 17, 1944

Director: Robert Siodmak; Screenplay: Bernard C. Schoenfeld based on the novel by “William Irish” (Cornell Woolrich); Cinematography: Woody Bredell; Music: Jans J. Salter; Producer: Joan Harrison; Studio: Universal

Cast: Franchot Tone (Jack Marlow), Ella Raines (Carol “Kansas” Richman), Alan Curtis (Scott Henderson), Aurora Miranda (Estela Monteiro), Thomas Gomez (Inspector Burgess), Fay Helm (Ann Terry), Elisa Cook, Jr. (Cliff Milburn)

It is amazing to consider that although he never actually penned a screenplay himself, the writer Cornell Woolrich remains one of the towering figures of film noir – and really of noir in general, including pulp novels and mysteries. The list of classic films based on Woolrich short stories or novels is staggering and a number of them will be featured in this noir countdown. In the case of Phantom Lady, which Woolrich penned under the pseudonym William Irish, it is truly a meeting of noir masters, as the legendary writer’s source material is directed by German refugee Robert Siodmak. Siodmak would go on to become one of the most recognizable artists in the genre, but with Phantom Lady he made his first foray into noir while finding himself in the new Hollywood setting. And find his way he did, transforming a story with significant plot obstacles and establishing a stylistic template that helped define the look of future noirs.

The story itself is over the top and, in all honesty, pulpy to the point of being barely believable. It is a familiar setup, as Scott Henderson (Alan Curtis), a highly successful businessman, leaves home after a fight with his wife and finds himself alone in a bar with a just one other patron – a well-dressed, beautiful young lady (Ann Terry). Not wanting to become entangled in a relationship, the two agree to remain anonymous and not so much as reveal their names to each other. Returning home, Scott discovers that his wife has been strangled. Admitting to the fight earlier in the evening, Scott quickly becomes the prime suspect. His alibi to prove his innocence is that he spent the night with the phantom lady, but not knowing so much as her name he is unable to produce her. Retracing his footsteps, every potential witness that can validate his presence at the bar, night show and other stops claim to have never seen Scott with the mysterious woman. Either the entire affair is a figment of Scott’s imagination or someone has gotten to the witnesses. Charged with the murder, he is convicted and scheduled for execution. His loyal secretary Carol “Kansas” Richman (Ella Raines), who has never believed the accusations, works feverishly to prove his innocence. With the help of a detective, she scrambles to try and find the phantom lady before it is too late.

Siodmak has a number of noirs to his credit that I think are absolute, undisputed masterpieces. This is not one of them – the story is just too limiting. It is, however, an interesting experience precisely because Siodmak is in the director’s chair. Siodmak signed a seven-year contract with Universal Studios when he came to Hollywood in 1943 and Phantom Lady was his third film in the United States. And this would his first box office success, giving his career a significant jumpstart. Siodmak came to the States well-schooled in the German Expressionist style of filmmaking, and with another German expatriate Fritz Lang, would help define the overall look of the noir era.


All of the noir staples are in evidence here. The sharp, striking contrast between light and dark, to the point that characters are completely silhouetted and their movements can be followed by nothing but shadows. The dim, menacing New York City streets, exuding the impression that potential evil waits at every street corner. Jazz music heard playing throughout. These are elements that would become stock tools of other noir directors, but here Siodmak is like an alchemist trying to find the correct formula. Teaming with cinematographer Woody Bredell – who he would also work with on 1946’s The Killers – Siodmak uses lighting and camera positioning to manufacture very tense, and not to mention sexy, scenes. One in particular, as Kansas tries to seduce a drummer (Elisha Cook, Jr.) in order to get information, is as steamy as I can imagine the Hays Code allowing to slip through.

Clunky dialogue and plot holes aside, this is a noir that needs to be seen by all enthusiasts. Not only is it visually interesting, but it allows you to see the first full-fledged noir from a director who would shortly thereafter emerge as one of the preeminent practitioners. It is Siodmak’s show throughout, and when viewed as a warm-up for the great things that he and Woody Bredell would do together two years later, it is also an intriguing historical document.

11 comments:

  1. This Siodmak effort is very overrated. It is largely flat and over-drawn. Only Woody Bredell’s noir photography and the orgasmic jazz jam session add jive to Siodmak’s otherwise lackluster direction. Ella Raines' gum-chewing floozy is embarrassingly risible.

    ReplyDelete
  2. We're closer to agreeing than it seems, Tony... as I said, the story is the biggest problem. But I disagree with the "lackluster direction" assessment and think that Siodmak works quite well with Bredell here. The look is what is most fascinating to me with this one. Far from great, but one I still like.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I like this film for just about the same reasons mentioned, Brendell's cinematography and the sexually filled jam session scene with Elisha Cook Jr. trying to prove himself to Ella Raines. The plot holes are the main problem.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Unfortunately I haven't watched any of the 3 movies that you've reviewed in your noir countdown so far. Nonetheless I'm keeping my fingers crossed so that something that I've watched comes up sooner or later - though I'm pretty sure almost all the Noir films I've watched will figure in your countdown, provided of course you consider them as noir in the first place :)

    ReplyDelete
  5. Ah, PHANTOM LADY. Well, I have this on the once-rare Region 2, and I like the atmospherics, though I can't argue with the issues you have here Dave - subsequently corroborated by Tony. Of course Siodmak is a master and several others of his films are genre benchmarks, though I will point to a little seen 1945 old dark house thriller with Ethel Barrymore as a domineering matriarch, THE SPIRAL STAIRCASE, as one to make particular note of here, especially since his other more well-known films are always on the table.

    Three excellent capsules in a row. Tell me I'm not at all surprised.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Dave, Siodmak hit the ground running with SON OF DRACULA, in which noir elements overwhelm the horror trappings to the point that the femme fatale is duping Dracula himself. I haven't caught up with this one yet, but I figure that if it falls in the period between Son and THE KILLERS I ought to like it, within reason.

    ReplyDelete
  7. John - I agree... not on to necessarily throw on and rewatch for sheer enjoyment, but I still think it's one to be appreciated for the look. Plus, as a Siodmak fan, one to definitely catch.

    Shubhajit - This is a good thing! Now you have some movies to catch up on... this one is a bit harder to get your hands on, but The Woman in the Window and Act of Violence have been widely released.

    Sam - "Atmospherics" is the perfect description. Because of the atmospherics alone, I like it. I actually had to go to eBay to get a burned DVD copy of this one, so I'm guessing that's why it's not very widely seen. I have seen THE SPRIAL STAIRCASE also and agree that it's another gem.

    Samuel - That's the thing with this one... if you're a Siodmak fan, it's definitely one you're going to want to see. The story is not up to part with his other work, but it's still interesting to see in order to watch his progression.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I'm reading along, Dave, and enjoying your reviews, but am only going to chip in if it's a movie I've seen - afraid I haven't seen any of the three so far, but do admire your accounts of them.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I liked it, though I find it a little bit weird that Franchot Tone (one of my favorite actors and credited first) appears only about 45 minutes into the movie.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Deborah Lazaroff AlpiMarch 17, 2010 at 8:29 PM

    I love this film. I think it's an excellent adaptation of the William Irish AKA Cornell Woolrich novel, probably the best. Woolrich and Noir were made for each other. I also love the fact that the film was produced by Joan Harrison, Hitchcock's protege who later produced his television series. I'm the author of a book about Siodmak.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Deborah. I have a copy of your book here! I'm currently writing a Master's dissertation on RS, who despite your fine efforts, is *still* hugely under-represented. I too love Phantom Lady. So very atmospheric. Thanks for your valuable input into Siodmak scholarship!
    With my regards,
    Michael
    michaelholcroft@live.co.uk)

    ReplyDelete